SCIENTIFIC-PRACTICAL JOURNAL

| укр | рус |

 

 


No4(4) 2021

Back to the issue


DOI 10.37219/2528-8253-2021-4-54

Shkorbotun YaV
Maxillary sinus cyst as a risk factor for osteomeatal complex block 
Shkorbotun Yaroslav V
State Institution of Science «Research and Practical Center of Preventive and Clinical Medicine»
State Administration Department
Department of miniinvasive surgery, Kyiv, Ukraine
National University of Helthcare named after P. L. Shupyk, Department of Otolaryngology, Kyiv, Ukraine
Candidate of Medical Sciences, Associate Professor
Email: lorkiev@ukr.net
Orchid ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3103-7194

Abstract

Introduction: Cysts of the maxillary sinuses are found in about 10% of the population. There is a necessity to clarify indications for cyst removal taking into account its size.
The purpose of the study to clarify the indications for surgical treatment of maxillary sinus cysts as a risk factor for sinus drainage disorders in the development of maxillary sinusitis.
Methods and materials: 57 people (92 sinuses) were examined. There were 20 patients (40 sinuses) with acute rhinosinusitis, 22 patients (22 sinuses) with post-augmentation sinusitis, and 15 (30 sinuses) almost healthy individuals among them. Prediction of the cyst size, which can lead to blockage of the maxillary sinus ostium, was performed by direct measurement on coronary sections at the ostiomeatal complex level distance from the surface of the mucoperiosteum in the area of the alveolar recessus to the lower surface of the mucosal surface in the area of the ostium. The obtained data were verified by calculation method taking into account the height of the sinus at the level of the osteomeatal complex, the magnitude of possible mucoperiosteum edema in the alveolar recessus and ostium in acute rhinosinusitis and post-augmentation sinusitis, as well as the magnitude of mucoperiosteum elevation due to sinus lift.
Results: It was found that the vertical size of the cyst, which can potentially lead to blockage of the maxillary sinus ostium in acute rhinosinusitis is 21.2±0.8 mm, 14.7±1.1 mm in sinusitis after augmentation of the maxilla, and 28.5±0.7 mm in practically healthy individuals. The calculated values are 18.5 mm, 14.0 mm and 24.5 mm, respectively. In case of acute rhinosinusitis, the distance from the apex of the cyst to the surface of the mucous membrane of the ostiomeatal complex area may decrease by 12.8 mm, and in sinusitis after sinus lift it may decrease by 20.4 mm.
Conclusions: To assess the potential of the ostiomeatal complex block by a cyst located in the alveolar recessus in acute rhinosinusitis, its vertical size is really important according to coronary sections of at the ostiomeatal complex level corresponding to the location of 5-6 teeth of the upper jaw. The indication for removal of the cyst of the alveolar recessus of the maxillary sinus, as a factor that may worsen the course of acute rhinosinusitis due to the anastomosis block, is its size exceeding 20 mm, and 15 mm for patients who plan to sinus lift.

Keywords

maxillary sinus cyst, ostium block, sinusitis, subantral bone augmentation, sinus lift, indications for surgical treatment.


Reference

  1. Bal M, Salturk Z, Bal GC, Berkiten G, Atar Y, Sünnetçi G. Mucous Retention Cysts in the Paranasal Sinuses: A Retrospective Study Otolaryngology Online Journal. 2016;6(2):109. Available from: https://www.alliedacademies.org/articles/
    mucous-retention-cysts-in-the-paranasal-sinuses-a-retrospective-study.html.
  2. Gonçales ES, Gonçales AG, Lima ES, Rocha JF, Noleto JW, Hochuli-Vieira E. Symptomatic mucous retention cysts of the maxillary sinus: Case report. Rev Sul Bras Odontol. 2015;12:233-7. Available from: http://revodonto.bvsalud.org/ scielo.php?script =sci_arttext&pid=S1984-56852015000200015#back.
  3. Grjibovski AM, Ivanov SV. Gorbatova MA. [Descriptive statistics using statistica and spss software]. Nauka I Zdravoohranenie. 2016;1. Available from: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/opisatelnayastatistika-s-ispolzovaniem-paketov-statisticheskih-programm-statistica-i-spss. [In Russian].
  4. Hankyeol K, Eun Kyu Lee, Hyo Yeol Kim, SangDuck Hong, Hun-Jong Dhong, Seung-Kyu Chung, MD A Case of Symptomatic Maxillary Retention Cyst. Journal Rhinology. 2018;25(1):59-62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18787/jr.2018.25.1.59.
  5. Haaga JR, Boll D. Computer Tomography & Magnetic Resonance Imaging Of The Whole Body. Elsevier Health Sciences, 2016. P. 2904. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.1880050206.
  6. Kryukov AI, Tsarapkin GY, Zayratyants OV, Tovmasyan AS, Fedotkina KM, Artemyeva-Karelova AV, Panasov SA. [The strategy of the of surgical treatment of the cysts in the maxillary sinus]. Vestn Otorinolaringol. 2019;84(1):42-5.
    DOI: https://doi:10.17116/otorino20198401142. [In Russian].
  7. Lee IH, Kim DH, Kim SW, Park JB, Kim SW. An Anatomic Study on the Maxillary Sinus Mucosal Thickness and the Distance between the Maxillary Sinus Ostium and Sinus Floor for the Maxillary Sinus Augmentation. Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania). 2020;56(9):470. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina56090470.
  8. O'Brien WT Sr, Hamelin S, Weitzel EK. The Preoperative Sinus CT: Avoiding a "CLOSE" Call with Surgical Complications.] Radiology. 2016;281(1):10-21. DOI: https://doi:10.1148/radiol.2016152230.
  9. Omezli M, Torul D, Cankaya S. Frequency and characteristics of retention cysts in the maxillary sinus in a Turkish patient population. J. Stomat. Occ. Med. 2015;8:17-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12548-015-0120-z.
  10. Piotrovich AV., Latyushina LS. [Analysing the structure and frequency complication of indirect sinuslift with single-stepdental implantation]. Modern problems of science and education. 2016;1. Available from: http://www.scienceeducation.ru/ ru/article/view?id=24062. [In Russian].
  11. Shkorbotun YaV. [X-ray Features of the Mucoperiastole of the Alveolar Bay of the Maxillary Sinus, as a Risk Factor for Developing Intraoperative Complications in Subantral Bone Augmentation]. Ukrajins'kyj zhurnal medytsini, bіologії ta sportu.
    2018;1(3);199-205. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26693/jmbs03.01.199. [In Ukrainian].
  12. Torretta S, Mantovani M, Testori T, Cappadona M, Pignataro L. Importance of ENT assessment in stratifying candidates for sinus floor elevation: a prospective clinical study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013;24;Suppl A:100:57-62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02371.x.
  13. Wagner F, Dvorak G, Nemec S, Pietschmann P, Traxler H, Schicho K, Seemann R. Morphometric analysis of sinus depth in the posterior maxilla and proposal of a novel classification. Sci Rep. 2017;7:45397. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ srep45397.
  14. Weber RK, Hosemann W. Comprehensive review on endonasal endoscopic sinus surgery. GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015;14:Doc08. DOI: https://doi:10.3205/ cto000123.
  15. Xiao J1, Chen J1, Wang Y2 Balloon catheter dilation technology combined with a fibrolaryngoscope to treat a maxillary sinuscyst. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2016;273(2):407-11. DOI: https://doi:10.1007/s00405-015-3588-7.
 

© 2019, Public Organization «Ukrainian Scientific Medical Society of Otorhinolaryngologists»